Many organisations are working
extremely hard both in and outside Ireland to bring about a
reduction, or the complete removal of the Irish drift-net fishery.
ART has been pleased to lend its support to member trusts, led
by Brian Marshall of the Wessex Salmon and Rivers Trust (WSRT),
in a complaint dating from 2002 to the European Commission,
in respect of the impact of the drift-nets on returning salmon
bound for Special Area of Conservation (SAC) designated rivers,
under the Habitats Directive.
Following an intense week of activity
in Brussels and the European Parliament, which saw ART provide
a briefing to MEP’s (our thanks to the EA for their data),
backed up by Niall Greene of Stop Salmon Drift Nets Now, and
separate presentations by Brian Marshall and Orri Vigfússon,
news of the complaint being upheld was extremely welcome.
|
|
ART
Chairman Ian Gregg in Brussels |
Irish
drift-netting boat |
In his letter to Brian Marshall,
Liam Cashman for the European Commission states,
“Having investigated your complaint, the Commission has
decided, on the basis of the information currently at its disposal,
to send Ireland a Letter of Formal Notice (first written warning)
for non-compliance with the requirements of Directive 92/43/EEC
on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild flora and
fauna and Article 10 of the EC Treaty. More specifically, it
appears that Ireland’s procedures for annually regulating
the total allowable catch (TAC) of wild salmon by way of drift-netting
do not take adequate account of the conservation objectives
of sites that have been proposed as special areas of conservation
(SACs) for the species and of the general EU objective of ensuring
that the salmon is maintained at or restored to favourable conservation
status. This is reflected in the lack of recognition by the
Irish authorities of the applicability of the Directive to the
setting of the TAC, the apparent formulation of scientific advice
on the TAC that takes insufficient account of the mixed-stock
nature of the fishery (i.e. the potential for adverse effects
outside of individual fishery districts) and a non-adherence
to scientific advice in decision-making."